Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A positive take on schizophrenia negative symptom scales: Converting scores between the SANS, NSA and SDS

  • FBIRN

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aims: To provide quantitative conversions between commonly used scales for the assessment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Method: Linear regression analyses generated conversion equations between symptom scores from the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), the Schedule for the Deficit Syndrome (SDS), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), or the Negative Symptoms Assessment (NSA) based on a cross sectional sample of 176 individuals with schizophrenia. Intraclass correlations assessed the rating conversion accuracy based on a separate sub-sample of 29 patients who took part in the initial study as well as an independent sample of 28 additional subjects with schizophrenia. Results: Between-scale negative symptom ratings were moderately to highly correlated (r = 0.73–0.91). Intraclass correlations between the original negative symptom rating scores and those obtained via using the conversion equations were in the range of 0.61–0.79. Conclusions: While there is a degree of non-overlap, several negative symptoms scores reflect measures of similar constructs and may be reliably converted between some scales. The conversion equations are provided at http://www.converteasy.org and may be used for meta- and mega-analyses that examine negative symptoms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-119
Number of pages7
JournalSchizophrenia Research
Volume201
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Conversion
  • Meta-
  • Multi-center
  • Multi-site
  • NSA
  • Negative symptoms
  • PANSS
  • SANS
  • SDA
  • Schizophrenia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A positive take on schizophrenia negative symptom scales: Converting scores between the SANS, NSA and SDS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this