TY - JOUR
T1 - A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes and Measures of Overall Health in Adults
AU - Gangannagaripalli, Jaheeda
AU - Albagli, Andrea
AU - Myers, Stacie N.
AU - Whittaker, Sarah
AU - Joseph, Andria
AU - Clarke, Anna
AU - Matkin, Lucy
AU - Alonso, Jordi
AU - Byock, Ira
AU - van den Berg, Michael
AU - Canfield, Carolyn
AU - Chaplin, John
AU - Dapueto, Juan
AU - de Almedia Fleck, Marcelo Pio
AU - Sidey-Gibbons, Chris
AU - Hazelzet, Jan
AU - Hess, Rachel
AU - Immonen, Kaisa
AU - Joyner, Serena
AU - Katz, Catherine
AU - Kerrigan, Carolyn
AU - Lam, Cindy
AU - Lunn, Joanne
AU - McKenzie, Fiona
AU - Roeves, Alastair
AU - Stowell, Caleb
AU - Switaj, Timothy
AU - Tinsley, Melissa
AU - Zimlichman, Eyal
AU - Valderas, Jose M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Background: The definition of population-specific outcomes is an essential precondition for the implementation of value-based health care. We developed a minimum standard outcome set for overall adult health (OAH) to facilitate the implementation of value-based health care in tracking, comparing, and improving overall health care outcomes of adults across multiple conditions, which would be of particular relevance for primary care and public health populations. Methods: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) convened an international panel (patients, clinicians, and topic experts). Following the development of a conceptual framework, a modified Delphi method (supported by public consultations) was implemented to identify, in sequence, the relevant domains, the best instruments for measuring them, the timing of measurement, and the relevant adjustment variables. Findings: Outcomes were identified in relation to overall health status and the domains of physical, mental, and social health. Three instruments covering these domains were identified: PROMIS Scale v1.2—Global Health (10 items), WHO Wellbeing Index (5 items), and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (12 items). Case-mix variables included a range of sociodemographic and biometric measures. Yearly measurement was proposed for all outcomes and most case-mix variables. Interpretation: The ICHOM OAH Standard Set has been developed through consensus-based methods based on predefined criteria following high standards for the identification and selection of high-quality measures The involvements of a wide range of stakeholders supports the acceptability of the set, which is readily available for use and feasibility testing in clinical settings.
AB - Background: The definition of population-specific outcomes is an essential precondition for the implementation of value-based health care. We developed a minimum standard outcome set for overall adult health (OAH) to facilitate the implementation of value-based health care in tracking, comparing, and improving overall health care outcomes of adults across multiple conditions, which would be of particular relevance for primary care and public health populations. Methods: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) convened an international panel (patients, clinicians, and topic experts). Following the development of a conceptual framework, a modified Delphi method (supported by public consultations) was implemented to identify, in sequence, the relevant domains, the best instruments for measuring them, the timing of measurement, and the relevant adjustment variables. Findings: Outcomes were identified in relation to overall health status and the domains of physical, mental, and social health. Three instruments covering these domains were identified: PROMIS Scale v1.2—Global Health (10 items), WHO Wellbeing Index (5 items), and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (12 items). Case-mix variables included a range of sociodemographic and biometric measures. Yearly measurement was proposed for all outcomes and most case-mix variables. Interpretation: The ICHOM OAH Standard Set has been developed through consensus-based methods based on predefined criteria following high standards for the identification and selection of high-quality measures The involvements of a wide range of stakeholders supports the acceptability of the set, which is readily available for use and feasibility testing in clinical settings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118304907&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40271-021-00554-8
DO - 10.1007/s40271-021-00554-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 34719774
AN - SCOPUS:85118304907
SN - 1178-1653
VL - 15
SP - 341
EP - 351
JO - Patient
JF - Patient
IS - 3
ER -