Abstract CT226: Crizotinib (C) in patients (pts) with solid tumors with MET amplification (amp) or mutation (mut): Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) Study

Kathryn F. Mileham; Rom Leidner; See full list of authors in comments

Abstract CT226: Crizotinib (C) in patients (pts) with solid tumors with MET amplification (amp) or mutation (mut): Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) Study

Kathryn F. Mileham, Rom Leidner, See full list of authors in comments

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

Background: TAPUR is a phase II basket study evaluating antitumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in pts with advanced cancers with specific genomic alterations. Results in a cohort of pts with solid tumors and MET amp or mut treated with C are reported.

Methods: Eligible pts had no standard treatment (tx) options, had measurable disease, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2, and adequate organ function. Pts with non-small cell lung cancer were excluded. Genomic testing was performed in CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited site selected labs. Pts received C at 250 mg orally BID until disease progression. Low accruing histology-specific cohorts with MET amp or mut were collapsed into 1 histology-pooled cohort for analysis. Primary end point was disease control (DC) per investigator, defined as complete or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) of at least 16+ weeks (wks) duration (SD16+) per RECIST v1.1. The primary end point was summarized as a proportion and the hypothesized null DC rate of 15% was evaluated by a 1-sided exact binomial test with α= 0.10. Other end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response and SD, and safety.

Results: 31 pts with solid tumors (12 tumor types) and MET mut only (n=10), amp only (n=19), or mut and amp (n=1) were enrolled; 1 pt with overexpression was ineligible. 3 additional pts were unevaluable for efficacy. Table shows demographics and outcomes. 2 PR (both esophageal adenocarcinoma with MET amp) and 4 SD16+ (2 renal cell carcinoma, 1 with mut, 1 with amp; colorectal with amp; small intestine with amp) were observed for DC rate of 21% (1-sided 90% CI: 12%, 100%) and objective response rate of 7% (95% CI: 1%, 24%). The null DC rate was not rejected. 5 pts had ≥1 grade 3 tx-related adverse or serious adverse event.

Conclusions: C did not meet prespecified criteria to declare a signal of activity in pts with solid tumors with MET amp or mut.

Original language	Undefined/Unknown
State	Published - Apr 15 2023

Publication series

Name	Articles, Abstracts, and Reports

Access to Document

http://digitalcommons.providence.org/publications/7742

Cite this

@misc{f01785aa1ded4f88978552ca72ca3a0c,

title = "Abstract CT226: Crizotinib (C) in patients (pts) with solid tumors with MET amplification (amp) or mutation (mut): Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) Study",

abstract = "Background: TAPUR is a phase II basket study evaluating antitumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in pts with advanced cancers with specific genomic alterations. Results in a cohort of pts with solid tumors and MET amp or mut treated with C are reported. Methods: Eligible pts had no standard treatment (tx) options, had measurable disease, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2, and adequate organ function. Pts with non-small cell lung cancer were excluded. Genomic testing was performed in CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited site selected labs. Pts received C at 250 mg orally BID until disease progression. Low accruing histology-specific cohorts with MET amp or mut were collapsed into 1 histology-pooled cohort for analysis. Primary end point was disease control (DC) per investigator, defined as complete or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) of at least 16+ weeks (wks) duration (SD16+) per RECIST v1.1. The primary end point was summarized as a proportion and the hypothesized null DC rate of 15% was evaluated by a 1-sided exact binomial test with α= 0.10. Other end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response and SD, and safety. Results: 31 pts with solid tumors (12 tumor types) and MET mut only (n=10), amp only (n=19), or mut and amp (n=1) were enrolled; 1 pt with overexpression was ineligible. 3 additional pts were unevaluable for efficacy. Table shows demographics and outcomes. 2 PR (both esophageal adenocarcinoma with MET amp) and 4 SD16+ (2 renal cell carcinoma, 1 with mut, 1 with amp; colorectal with amp; small intestine with amp) were observed for DC rate of 21% (1-sided 90% CI: 12%, 100%) and objective response rate of 7% (95% CI: 1%, 24%). The null DC rate was not rejected. 5 pts had ≥1 grade 3 tx-related adverse or serious adverse event. Conclusions: C did not meet prespecified criteria to declare a signal of activity in pts with solid tumors with MET amp or mut.",

author = "Mileham, {Kathryn F.} and Rom Leidner and comments, {See full list of authors in}",

year = "2023",

month = apr,

day = "15",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

series = "Articles, Abstracts, and Reports",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Abstract CT226: Crizotinib (C) in patients (pts) with solid tumors with MET amplification (amp) or mutation (mut): Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) Study

AU - Mileham, Kathryn F.

AU - Leidner, Rom

AU - comments, See full list of authors in

PY - 2023/4/15

Y1 - 2023/4/15

N2 - Background: TAPUR is a phase II basket study evaluating antitumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in pts with advanced cancers with specific genomic alterations. Results in a cohort of pts with solid tumors and MET amp or mut treated with C are reported. Methods: Eligible pts had no standard treatment (tx) options, had measurable disease, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2, and adequate organ function. Pts with non-small cell lung cancer were excluded. Genomic testing was performed in CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited site selected labs. Pts received C at 250 mg orally BID until disease progression. Low accruing histology-specific cohorts with MET amp or mut were collapsed into 1 histology-pooled cohort for analysis. Primary end point was disease control (DC) per investigator, defined as complete or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) of at least 16+ weeks (wks) duration (SD16+) per RECIST v1.1. The primary end point was summarized as a proportion and the hypothesized null DC rate of 15% was evaluated by a 1-sided exact binomial test with α= 0.10. Other end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response and SD, and safety. Results: 31 pts with solid tumors (12 tumor types) and MET mut only (n=10), amp only (n=19), or mut and amp (n=1) were enrolled; 1 pt with overexpression was ineligible. 3 additional pts were unevaluable for efficacy. Table shows demographics and outcomes. 2 PR (both esophageal adenocarcinoma with MET amp) and 4 SD16+ (2 renal cell carcinoma, 1 with mut, 1 with amp; colorectal with amp; small intestine with amp) were observed for DC rate of 21% (1-sided 90% CI: 12%, 100%) and objective response rate of 7% (95% CI: 1%, 24%). The null DC rate was not rejected. 5 pts had ≥1 grade 3 tx-related adverse or serious adverse event. Conclusions: C did not meet prespecified criteria to declare a signal of activity in pts with solid tumors with MET amp or mut.

AB - Background: TAPUR is a phase II basket study evaluating antitumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in pts with advanced cancers with specific genomic alterations. Results in a cohort of pts with solid tumors and MET amp or mut treated with C are reported. Methods: Eligible pts had no standard treatment (tx) options, had measurable disease, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2, and adequate organ function. Pts with non-small cell lung cancer were excluded. Genomic testing was performed in CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited site selected labs. Pts received C at 250 mg orally BID until disease progression. Low accruing histology-specific cohorts with MET amp or mut were collapsed into 1 histology-pooled cohort for analysis. Primary end point was disease control (DC) per investigator, defined as complete or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) of at least 16+ weeks (wks) duration (SD16+) per RECIST v1.1. The primary end point was summarized as a proportion and the hypothesized null DC rate of 15% was evaluated by a 1-sided exact binomial test with α= 0.10. Other end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response and SD, and safety. Results: 31 pts with solid tumors (12 tumor types) and MET mut only (n=10), amp only (n=19), or mut and amp (n=1) were enrolled; 1 pt with overexpression was ineligible. 3 additional pts were unevaluable for efficacy. Table shows demographics and outcomes. 2 PR (both esophageal adenocarcinoma with MET amp) and 4 SD16+ (2 renal cell carcinoma, 1 with mut, 1 with amp; colorectal with amp; small intestine with amp) were observed for DC rate of 21% (1-sided 90% CI: 12%, 100%) and objective response rate of 7% (95% CI: 1%, 24%). The null DC rate was not rejected. 5 pts had ≥1 grade 3 tx-related adverse or serious adverse event. Conclusions: C did not meet prespecified criteria to declare a signal of activity in pts with solid tumors with MET amp or mut.

M3 - Other contribution

T3 - Articles, Abstracts, and Reports

ER -