Abstract
The treatment of cervical spine dislocation is still not without debate concerning anterior decompression and fusion versus posterior reduction and fusion. In cases of patients who are nonreducible by closed traction, imaging can help determine surgical approach based on degree of anterior compression by disc or bone. In patients who have undergone closed reduction, the surgical approach may beperformed by either anterior or posterior methods without significant differences in pain, kyphosis, or neurologic outcomes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 174-181 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Current Opinion in Orthopaedics |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2003 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Anterior versus posterior surgical treatment for traumatic cervical spine dislocation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver