Assessment of Toxic Effects and Survival in Treatment Deescalation With Radiotherapy vs Transoral Surgery for HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma The ORATOR2 Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

David A. Palma, Eitan Prisman, Eric Berthelet, Eric Tran, Sarah Hamilton, Jonn Wu, Antoine Eskander, Kevin Higgins, Irene Karam, Ian Poon, Zain Husain, Danny Enepekides, Michael Hier, Khalil Sultanem, Keith Richardson, Alex Mlynarek, Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki, Michael Odell, Andrew Bayley, Samuel DowthwaiteJames E. Jackson, Marcin Dzienis, John O'Neil, Shamir Chandarana, Robyn Banerjee, Robert Hart, Jeffson Chung, Todd Tenenholtz, Suren Krishnan, Hien Le, John Yoo, Adrian Mendez, Eric Winquist, Sara Kuruvilla, Paul Stewart, Andrew Warner, Sylvia Mitchell, Jeff Chen, Christina Parker, Bret Wehrli, Keith Kwan, Julie Theurer, Jinka Sathya, J. Alex Hammond, Nancy Read, Varagur Venkatesan, S. Danielle MacNeil, Kevin Fung, Anthony C. Nichols

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

72 Scopus citations

Abstract

IMPORTANCE The optimal approach for treatment deescalation in human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) is unknown. OBJECTIVE To assess a primary radiotherapy (RT) approach vs a primary transoral surgical (TOS) approach in treatment deescalation for HPV-related OPSCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This international, multicenter, open-label parallel-group phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 9 tertiary academic cancer centers in Canada and Australia and enrolled patients with T1-T2N0-2 p16-positive OPSCC between February 13, 2018, and November 17, 2020. Patients had up to 3 years of follow-up. INTERVENTIONS Primary RT (consisting of 60 Gy of RT with concurrent weekly cisplatin in node-positive patients) vs TOS and neck dissection (ND) (with adjuvant reduced-dose RT depending on pathologic findings). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was overall survival (OS) compared with a historical control. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life, and toxic effects. RESULTS Overall, 61 patients were randomized (30 [49.2%] in the RT arm and 31 [50.8%] in the TOS and ND arm; median [IQR] age, 61.9 [57.2-67.9] years; 8 women [13.6%] and 51 men [86.4%]; 31 [50.8%] never smoked). The trial began in February 2018, and accrual was halted in November 2020 because of excessive toxic effects in the TOS and ND arm. Median follow-up was 17 months (IQR, 15-20 months). For the OS end point, there were 3 death events, all in the TOS and ND arm, including the 2 treatment-related deaths (0.7 and 4.3 months after randomization, respectively) and 1 of myocardial infarction at 8.5 months. There were 4 events for the PFS end point, also all in the TOS and ND arm, which included the 3 mortality events and 1 local recurrence. Thus, the OS and PFS data remained immature. Grade 2 to 5 toxic effects occurred in 20 patients (67%) in the RT arm and 22 (71%) in the TOS and ND arm. Mean (SD) MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory scores at 1 year were similar between arms (85.7 [15.6] and 84.7 [14.5], respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial, TOS was associated with an unacceptable risk of grade 5 toxic effects, but patients in both trial arms achieved good swallowing outcomes at 1 year. Long-term follow-up is required to assess OS and PFS outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJAMA Oncology
Volume8
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of Toxic Effects and Survival in Treatment Deescalation With Radiotherapy vs Transoral Surgery for HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma The ORATOR2 Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this