Abstract
To the Editor: I am disturbed by the leeway taken by Luthy et al.1 (and allowed them by the accompanying editorial)2 in their conclusions focusing on the mode of delivery as the determinant of subsequent motor function in infants with meningomyelocele (March 7 issue). The authors had as their study population nearly all the infants with meningomyelocele in the state of Washington over the past 10 years. The mothers fell into two basic groups — those with antenatal diagnoses, who were referred to the study centers, where primary cesarean section without labor was forcefully “offered” (all the women accepted), and.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 359-360 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | New England Journal of Medicine |
| Volume | 325 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1 1991 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cesarean section before labor for infants with meningomyelocele'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver