Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of 2 doses of etanercept (50 vs 100 mg) in active rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized double blind study

  • Alyssa K. Johnsen
  • , Michael H. Schiff
  • , Philip J. Mease
  • , Larry W. Moreland
  • , Agnes L. Maier
  • , Jonathan S. Coblyn
  • , Simon M. Helfgott
  • , Jonathan A. Leff
  • , Michael E. Weinblatt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective. To assess the safety and efficacy of etanercept 50 mg administered twice weekly versus 25 mg administered twice weekly as monotherapy in patients with tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) blocker-naïve active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. Seventy-seven patients with RA were randomized in an unequal allocation (2:1) in a blinded fashion to receive either 50 mg (51 patients) or 25 mg (26 patients) of etanercept twice a week for 24 weeks. Results. The primary outcome measure, the ACR-N AUC at 24 weeks, showed no difference between the 2 dose groups. In addition, there was no difference in ACR 20, 50, and 70 responses or in EULAR response criteria by Week 24. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in the proportion of patients with any non-infectious adverse event. The proportion of patients with upper respiratory tract infections was significantly higher in patients receiving 50 mg etanercept compared with those receiving 25 mg (26% vs 4%, p = 0.027). Conclusion. Etanercept as a monotherapy at 50 mg twice weekly does not provide increased efficacy when compared to the standard dose of 25 mg twice weekly in TNF-α blocker-naïve patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)659-664
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Rheumatology
Volume33
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 2006

Keywords

  • Dosage
  • Etanercept
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Rheumatoid arthritis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of 2 doses of etanercept (50 vs 100 mg) in active rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized double blind study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this