Abstract
In January 2010, a panel of Canadian oncologists with particular expertise in colorectal cancer (crc) gathered to develop a consensus guideline on the use of therapies against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in the management of metastatic CRC (MCRC). This paper uses a case-based approach to summarize the consensus recommendations developed during that meeting. These are the consensus recommendations: 1. Testing for the KRAS status of the tumour should be performed as soon as an EGFR inhibitor is being considered as an option for treatment. 2. Anti-EGFR therapies are not recommended for the treatment of patients with tumours showing mutated KRAS status. 3. For a patient with wild-type KRAS and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status of 0-2, whose mcrc has previously been treated with a fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin, switching to an EGFR inhibitor is a recommended strategy. 4. Cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab are all options for third-line therapy in patients with wild-type KRAS, provided that tolerability is acceptable.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 39-45 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Current Oncology |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Anti-EGFR
- Canadian consensus
- Cetuximab
- Metastatic colorectal cancer
- Panitumumab
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Consensus recommendations for the use of anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver