Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Controversies: Extended Endoscopic vs. Open Transcranial Approaches. Extended Endoscopic vs. Open Transcranial Approaches.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery approaches for resecting craniopharyngiomas have expanded to include pathological conditions that would have not been contemplated through a transsphenoidal route a few years ago. Early results from many case series seem to confirm the safety and efficacy of endoscopic surgery and extended endoscopic surgery. Meanwhile, the continued use of the microscopic transsphenoidal technique with the assistance of the endoscope remains a viable method for addressing ventral midline craniopharyngiomas. Endoscopy may one day become the gold standard for addressing midline craniopharyngiomas, but this will require improvements in technique and instrumentation as well as dedication on the part of skull base trainees to become acquainted with the endoscope and develop their skills early in their careers. Although the transcranial approach is becoming less popular for the resection of craniopharyngiomas, it will always have a role to play in tackling larger lesions with lateral extensions, and recurrent lesions previously resected via the transsphenoidal route.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCraniopharyngiomas
Subtitle of host publicationComprehensive Diagnosis, Treatment and Outcome
PublisherElsevier Inc.
Pages555-566
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)9780124167230
ISBN (Print)9780124167063
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 8 2015

Keywords

  • Craniopharyngioma
  • Endonasal
  • Endoscopic surgery
  • Transcranial
  • Transsphenoidal
  • Tumor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Controversies: Extended Endoscopic vs. Open Transcranial Approaches. Extended Endoscopic vs. Open Transcranial Approaches.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this