TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of the Student Nurse Subjective Evaluation of Completed Clinical Practice Placement Instrument
AU - Kavanagh, Adam
AU - Prentice, Garry
AU - Donohue, Gráinne
AU - Doyle, Caroline
AU - Farrington, Aoife
AU - Jennings, Bernie
AU - King, Marie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Slack Incorporated. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Background: Instruments that measure clinical learning environments have lacked rigorous methodological approaches in their development and validity. Method: Development research using a survey design approach was conducted for an instrument to evaluate the quality of nursing students’ clinical practice placement. Results: The development and validity of the Student Nurse Subjective Evaluation of Completed Clinical Practice Placement (SNEP) resulted in a 40-item instrument to evaluate nursing students’ experience of their completed clinical practice placement. Adequate level of model fit was indicated (χ2[719] = 1909.47, p < .001) for the confirmatory factor analysis (χ2/df = 2.66, comparative fit index = 0.92, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.92, and root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.07). Standardized factor loadings were high, ranging from 0.68 to 0.95. Conclusion: The SNEP was designed and validated incorporating the perspective of various nurse stakeholders and can be used in both research and clinical learning environments.
AB - Background: Instruments that measure clinical learning environments have lacked rigorous methodological approaches in their development and validity. Method: Development research using a survey design approach was conducted for an instrument to evaluate the quality of nursing students’ clinical practice placement. Results: The development and validity of the Student Nurse Subjective Evaluation of Completed Clinical Practice Placement (SNEP) resulted in a 40-item instrument to evaluate nursing students’ experience of their completed clinical practice placement. Adequate level of model fit was indicated (χ2[719] = 1909.47, p < .001) for the confirmatory factor analysis (χ2/df = 2.66, comparative fit index = 0.92, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.92, and root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.07). Standardized factor loadings were high, ranging from 0.68 to 0.95. Conclusion: The SNEP was designed and validated incorporating the perspective of various nurse stakeholders and can be used in both research and clinical learning environments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139318138&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3928/01484834-20220803-10
DO - 10.3928/01484834-20220803-10
M3 - Article
C2 - 36197302
AN - SCOPUS:85139318138
SN - 0148-4834
VL - 61
SP - 559
EP - 569
JO - Journal of Nursing Education
JF - Journal of Nursing Education
IS - 10
ER -