Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Early experience with UGN-101 for the treatment of upper tract urothelial cancer – A multicenter evaluation of practice patterns and outcomes

  • Solomon L. Woldu
  • , Craig Labbate
  • , Katie S. Murray
  • , Kyle Rose
  • , Wade Sexton
  • , Isamu Tachibana
  • , Hristos Kaimakliotis
  • , Joseph Jacob
  • , Rian Dickstein
  • , Jennifer Linehan
  • , Alan Nieder
  • , Marc A. Bjurlin
  • , Mitchell Humphreys
  • , Saum Ghodoussipour
  • , Marcus L. Quek
  • , Michael O'Donnell
  • , Brian H. Eisner
  • , Adam S. Feldman
  • , Surena F. Matin
  • , Yair Lotan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: UGN-101 is a novel delivery system for intracavitary treatment of upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). UGN-101 was approved based on a pivotal trial for small volume residual low-grade UTUC. Our aim was to report our experience with UGN-101 in a more heterogenous and real-world setting. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all UGN-101 cases from 15 institutions with a focus on practice patterns, efficacy, and adverse effects. We include UGN-101 utilization in both the chemoablative and adjuvant setting. Results: There were a total 136 renal units treated from 132 patients. The majority of cases were biopsy proven low-grade UTUC. Practice patterns varied considerably - the most common administration technique was antegrade instillation via a percutaneous nephrostomy. When utilized in the adjuvant setting, 69% of patients were disease free at the time of their first endoscopic evaluation, while in the chemoablative setting, 37% were endoscopically clear on the first evaluation (P < 0.001). Complete response was higher in patients with smaller tumor size prior to UGN-101 induction; low volume (<1 cm) residual disease was associated with a 70% complete response, similar to disease free rate at first endoscopic evaluation when UGN-101 was used in the adjuvant setting. The use of maintenance doses of UGN-101 was reported in 27% of cases. The overall incidence of new onset, clinically significant ureteral stenosis was 23%. Conclusions: This study represents the largest review of patients treated with UGN-101 and can serve as a basis of ongoing hypotheses regarding treatment with UGN-101 for UTUC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)147.e15-147.e21
JournalUrologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Chemoablation
  • Jelmyto
  • UGN-101
  • UTUC
  • Upper tract urothelial cancer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Early experience with UGN-101 for the treatment of upper tract urothelial cancer – A multicenter evaluation of practice patterns and outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this