TY - JOUR
T1 - Ethics Roundtable
T2 - Advance Directives, Autonomy, and Gastrostomy Placement
AU - Baumrucker, Steven J.
AU - VandeKieft, Gregg
AU - Smith, Eddy R.
AU - Stolick, Matt
AU - Jefferson, Vladlena
AU - Boyles, Scott P.
AU - Thatcher, Kristin L.
AU - Leach, Rebecca J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - CL is a 94-year-old male who is brought to the Emergency Department from an assisted living facility due to a new onset of weakness and altered mental status. He was in his usual state of moderately compensated health, requiring assistance for most activities of daily living due to medical frailty and a previous right brain CVA with residual mild left sided weakness. On the day of admission, the staff found him lethargic and disoriented. The family requested a surgical consult for percutaneous, endoscopic, gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement. A review of the patient’s records showed that the patient had refused a PEG tube during his last two hospitalizations. During the last admission, the hospitalist documented that the patient repeatedly refused nutritional support stating “if it’s my time, I’ve lived a full life. I’m ready to die and join my wife.” There was no advance care plan (“living will”), but CL did sign a “Selection of Surrogate Decision-maker” form previously, assigning his nephew as primary surrogate. Under pressure from multiple family members, including the designated surrogate, the attending requested a surgical consultation. The surgical team determined that the patient did not have capacity and scheduled CL for PEG tube placement. The care team had concerns regarding the conflict between the patient’s previously (and consistently) stated desires and the family’s wishes; an ethics consult was requested.
AB - CL is a 94-year-old male who is brought to the Emergency Department from an assisted living facility due to a new onset of weakness and altered mental status. He was in his usual state of moderately compensated health, requiring assistance for most activities of daily living due to medical frailty and a previous right brain CVA with residual mild left sided weakness. On the day of admission, the staff found him lethargic and disoriented. The family requested a surgical consult for percutaneous, endoscopic, gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement. A review of the patient’s records showed that the patient had refused a PEG tube during his last two hospitalizations. During the last admission, the hospitalist documented that the patient repeatedly refused nutritional support stating “if it’s my time, I’ve lived a full life. I’m ready to die and join my wife.” There was no advance care plan (“living will”), but CL did sign a “Selection of Surrogate Decision-maker” form previously, assigning his nephew as primary surrogate. Under pressure from multiple family members, including the designated surrogate, the attending requested a surgical consultation. The surgical team determined that the patient did not have capacity and scheduled CL for PEG tube placement. The care team had concerns regarding the conflict between the patient’s previously (and consistently) stated desires and the family’s wishes; an ethics consult was requested.
KW - advance care plan
KW - advance directive
KW - enteral feeding
KW - ethics
KW - living will
KW - surrogate decision-making
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142354094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/10499091221139823
DO - 10.1177/10499091221139823
M3 - Article
C2 - 36373275
AN - SCOPUS:85142354094
SN - 1049-9091
VL - 40
SP - 1285
EP - 1291
JO - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
JF - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
IS - 11
ER -