Evaluation of hemostatic devices in a randomized porcine model of junctional hemorrhage and 72-hour prolonged field care

Gilbert A. Pratt, Adam J. Kishman, Jacob J. Glaser, Cecilia Castro, Alejandra L. Lorenzen, Sylvain Cardin, Michael M. Tiller, Neal D. McNeal, Leslie E. Neidert, Clifford G. Morgan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage control in prolonged field care (PFC) presents unique challenges that drive the need for enhanced point of injury treatment capabilities to maintain patient stability beyond the Golden Hour. To address this, two hemostatic agents, Combat Gauze (CG) and XSTAT, were evaluated in a porcine model of uncontrolled junctional hemorrhage for speed of deployment and hemostatic efficacy over 72 hours. METHODS: The left subclavian artery and subscapular vein were isolated in anesthetized male Yorkshire swine (70–85 kg) and injured via 50% transection, followed by 30 seconds of hemorrhage. Combat Gauze (n = 6) or XSTAT (n = 6) was administered until bleeding stopped and remained within subjects for observation over 72 hours. Physiologic monitoring, hemostatic efficacy, and hematological parameters were measured throughout the protocol. Gross necropsy and histology were performed following humane euthanasia. RESULTS: Both CG and XSTAT maintained hemostasis throughout the full duration of the protocol. There were no significant differences between groups in hemorrhage volume (CG: 1021.0 ± 183.7 mL vs. XSTAT: 968.2 ± 243.3 mL), total blood loss (CG: 20.8 ± 2.7% vs. XSTAT: 20.1 ± 5.1%), or devices used (CG: 3.8 ± 1.2 vs. XSTAT: 5.3 ± 1.4). XSTAT absorbed significantly more blood than CG (CG: 199.5 ± 50.3 mL vs. XSTAT: 327.6 ± 71.4 mL) and was significantly faster to administer (CG: 3.4 ± 1.6 minutes vs. XSTAT: 1.4 ± 0.5 minutes). There were no significant changes in activated clot time, prothrombin time, or international normalized ratio between groups or compared with baseline throughout the 72-hour protocol. Histopathology revealed no evidence of microthromboemboli or disseminated coagulopathies across evaluated tissues in either group. CONCLUSION: Combat Gauze and XSTAT demonstrated equivalent hemostatic ability through 72 hours, with no overt evidence of coagulopathies from prolonged indwelling. In addition, XSTAT offered significantly faster administration and the ability to absorb more blood. Taken together, XSTAT offers logistical and efficiency advantages over CG for immediate control of junctional noncompressible hemorrhage, particularly in a tactical environment. In addition, extension of indicated timelines to 72 hours allows translation to PFC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)256-264
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume96
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Combat Gauze
  • Hemorrhage
  • junctional hemorrhage
  • prolonged field care
  • XSTAT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of hemostatic devices in a randomized porcine model of junctional hemorrhage and 72-hour prolonged field care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this