Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

First analysis of the safety and efficacy of UGN-101 in the treatment of ureteral tumors

  • Joseph M. Jacob
  • , Solomon L. Woldu
  • , Jennifer Linehan
  • , Craig Labbate
  • , Kyle M. Rose
  • , Wade J. Sexton
  • , Isamu Tachibana
  • , Hristos Kaimakliotis
  • , Alan Nieder
  • , Marc A. Bjurlin
  • , Mitchell Humphreys
  • , Saum B. Ghodoussipour
  • , Marcus L. Quek
  • , Brett Johnson
  • , Michael O'Donnell
  • , Brian H. Eisner
  • , Adam S. Feldman
  • , Katie S. Murray
  • , Surena F. Matin
  • , Yair Lotan
  • Rian J. Dickstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: UGN-101 has been approved for the chemoablation of low-grade upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) involving the renal pelvis and calyces. Herein is the first reported cohort of patients with ureteral tumors treated with UGN-101. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients treated with UGN-101 for UTUC at 15 high-volume academic and community centers focusing on outcomes of patients treated for ureteral disease. Patients received UGN-101 with either adjuvant or chemo-ablative intent. Response rates are reported for patients receiving chemo-ablative intent. Adverse outcomes were characterized with a focus on the rate of ureteral stenosis. Results: In a cohort of 132 patients and 136 renal units, 47 cases had tumor involvement of the ureter, with 12 cases of ureteral tumor only (8.8%) and 35 cases of ureteral plus renal pelvic tumors (25.7%). Of the 23 patients with ureteral involvement who received UGN-101 induction with chemo-ablative intent, the complete response was 47.8%, which did not differ significantly from outcomes in patients without ureteral involvement. Fourteen patients (37.8%) with ureteral tumors had significant ureteral stenosis at first post-treatment evaluation, however, when excluding those with pre-existing hydronephrosis or ureteral stenosis, only 5.4% of patients developed new clinically significant stenosis. Conclusions: UGN-101 appears to be safe and may have similar efficacy in treating low-grade urothelial carcinoma of the ureter as compared to renal pelvic tumors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20.e17-20.e23
JournalUrologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Chemoablation
  • Jelmyto
  • UGN-101
  • UTUC
  • Upper tract urothelial cancer
  • Ureter
  • Ureteral
  • Ureteral cancer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'First analysis of the safety and efficacy of UGN-101 in the treatment of ureteral tumors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this