Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Fish oil supplementation and risk of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in patients with implantable defibrillators: A randomized controlled trial

  • Merritt H. Raitt
  • , William E. Connor
  • , Cynthia Morris
  • , Jack Kron
  • , Blair Halperin
  • , Sumeet S. Chugh
  • , James McClelland
  • , James Cook
  • , Karen MacMurdy
  • , Robert Swenson
  • , Sonja L. Connor
  • , Glenn Gerhard
  • , Dale F. Kraemer
  • , Daniel Oseran
  • , Christy Marchant
  • , David Calhoun
  • , Reed Shnider
  • , John McAnulty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

373 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context: Clinical studies of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have shown a reduction in sudden cardiac death, suggesting that omega-3 PUFAs may have antiarrhythmic effects. Objective: To determine whether omega-3 PUFAs have beneficial antiarrhythmic effects in patients with a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Design and Setting: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed at 6 US medical centers with enrollment from February 1999 until January 2003. Patients: Two hundred patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and a recent episode of sustained VT or VF. Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to receive fish oil, 1.8 g/d, 72% omega-3 PUFAs, or placebo and were followed up for a median of 718 days (range, 20-828 days). Main Outcome Measures: Time to first episode of ICD treatment for VT/VF, changes in red blood cell concentrations of omega-3 PUFAs, frequency of recurrent VT/VF events, and predetermined subgroup analyses. Results: Patients randomized to receive fish oil had an increase in the mean percentage of omega-3 PUFAs in red blood cell membranes from 4.7% to 8.3% (P<.001), with no change observed in patients receiving placebo. At 6, 12, and 24 months, 46% (SE, 5%), 51% (5%), and 65% (5%) of patients randomized to receive fish oil had ICD therapy for VT/VF compared with 36% (5%), 41% (5%), and 59% (5%) for patients randomized to receive placebo (P=.19). In the subset of 133 patients whose qualifying arrhythmia was VT, 61% (SE, 6%), 66% (6%), and 79% (6%) of patients in the fish oil group had VT/VF at 6, 12, and 24 months compared with 37% (6%), 43% (6%), and 65% (6%) of patients in the control group (P=.007). Recurrent VT/VF events were more common in patients randomized to receive fish oil (P<.001). Conclusion: Among patients with a recent episode of sustained ventricular arrhythmia and an ICD, fish oil supplementation does not reduce the risk of VT/VF and may be proarrhythmic in some patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2884-2891
Number of pages8
JournalJAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume293
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fish oil supplementation and risk of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in patients with implantable defibrillators: A randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this