Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Novel Angular Measures of Cervical Deformity Account for Upper Cervical Compensation and Sagittal Alignment

  • Themistocles S. Protopsaltis
  • , Renaud Lafage
  • , Shaleen Vira
  • , Daniel Sciubba
  • , Alex Soroceanu
  • , Kojo Hamilton
  • , Justin Smith
  • , Peter G. Passias
  • , Gregory Mundis
  • , Robert Hart
  • , Frank Schwab
  • , Eric Klineberg
  • , Christopher Shaffrey
  • , Virginie Lafage
  • , Christopher Ames

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study Design: This is a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database. Objective: This study introduces 2 new cervical alignment measures accounting for both cervical deformity (CD) and upper cervical compensation. Summary of Background Data: Current descriptions of CD like the C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) do not account for compensatory mechanisms such as C0-C2 lordosis and pelvic tilt, which makes surgical planning difficult. The craniocervical angle (CCA) combines the slope of McGregor's line and the inclination from C7 to the hard palate. The C2-pelvic tilt (CPT) combines C2 tilt and pelvic tilt. Like the T1 pelvic angle, CPT is less affected by lower extremity and pelvic compensation. Methods: Novel and existing CD measures were correlated in 781 patients from a thoracolumbar deformity (TLD) database and 61 patients from a prospective CD database. CD patients were subanalyzed by region of deformity driver: Cervical or cervico-thoracic junction. TLD patients were substratified according to whether or not they had CD as well, where CD was defined as cSVA>4 cm or T1 slope minus cervical lordosis mismatch (TS-CL) >20. Results: TLD cohort: Mean cSVA was 31.7±17.8 mm. Subanalysis of TLD patients with CD versus no-CD demonstrated significant differences in CCA (56.2 vs. 60.6, P<0.001) and CPT (32.6 vs. 19.3, P<0.001). CCA and CPT correlated with cSVA (r=-0.488/r=0.418, P<0.001) and C0-C2 lordosis (r=-0.630/r=0.289,P<0.001). CD cohort: Mean cSVA was 47.3±32.2 mm. CCA and CPT correlated with cSVA (r=-0.811/r=0.657, P<0.001) and C0-C2 lordosis (r=-0.656/r=0.610, P<0.001). CD cohort subanalysis indicated that CT patients were significantly more deformed by cSVA (71.3 vs 24.0 mm, P<0.001), CCA (47.1 vs 59.1 degrees, P<0.001), and CPT (63.3 vs 43.8 degrees, P=0.002). Using linear regression analysis, cSVA of 4 cm corresponded to CCA of 53.2 degrees (r 2 =0.5) and CPT of 48.5 degrees (r 2 =0.4). Conclusions: CCA and CPT account for both cervical sagittal alignment and upper cervical compensation and can be utilized in assessment of cervical alignment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E959-E967
JournalClinical Spine Surgery
Volume30
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Keywords

  • HRQOL
  • Sagittal cervical deformity
  • upper cervical compensation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Novel Angular Measures of Cervical Deformity Account for Upper Cervical Compensation and Sagittal Alignment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this