Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

NRG/RTOG 1122: A phase 2, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of bevacizumab with and without trebananib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma or gliosarcoma

  • Eudocia Q. Lee
  • , Peixin Zhang
  • , Patrick Y. Wen
  • , Elizabeth R. Gerstner
  • , David A. Reardon
  • , Kenneth D. Aldape
  • , John F. deGroot
  • , Edward Pan
  • , Jeffrey J. Raizer
  • , Lyndon J. Kim
  • , Steven J. Chmura
  • , H. Ian Robins
  • , Jennifer M. Connelly
  • , James D. Battiste
  • , John L. Villano
  • , Naveed Wagle
  • , Ryan T. Merrell
  • , Merideth M. Wendland
  • , Minesh P. Mehta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) alone does not improve overall survival (OS) in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). The angiopoiein (Ang)–TIE2 system may play a role in tumor survival under VEGF inhibition. We conducted a phase 2, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of bevacizumab plus trebananib (a novel Fc fusion protein that sequesters Ang1/Ang2) over bevacizumab alone in rGBM. Methods: Patients ≥18 years of age with a Karnofsky performance status ≥70 and GBM or variants in first or second relapse were randomized to bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus trebananib 15 mg/kg every week or bevacizumab plus placebo. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Results: After an initial 6-patient lead-in cohort confirmed the safety of combining bevacizumab and trebananib, 115 eligible patients were randomized to the control (n = 58) or experimental treatment (n = 57). In the control arm, 6-month PFS was 41.1%, median survival time was 11.5 months (95% CI, 8.4-14.2 months), median PFS was 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.8-7.1 months), and radiographic response (RR) was 5.9%. In the experimental arm, 6-month PFS was 22.6%, median survival time was 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.8-10.1 months), median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.7-5.6 months), and RR was 4.2%. The rate of severe toxicities was not significantly different between arms. Conclusion: The combination of bevacizumab and trebananib was well tolerated but did not significantly improve 6-month PFS rate, PFS, or OS for patients with rGBM over bevacizumab alone. The shorter PFS in the experimental arm with a hazard ratio of 1.51 (P =.04) suggests that the addition of trebananib to bevacizumab is detrimental.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2821-2828
Number of pages8
JournalCancer
Volume126
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2020

Keywords

  • angiogenesis
  • angiopoietin
  • bevacizumab
  • glioblastoma
  • trebananib

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'NRG/RTOG 1122: A phase 2, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of bevacizumab with and without trebananib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma or gliosarcoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this