TY - JOUR
T1 - Perception of Treatment Success and Impact on Function with Antibiotics or Appendectomy for Appendicitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial with an Observational Cohort.
AU - Callie M, Thompson
AU - Emily C, Voldal
AU - Giana H, Davidson
AU - Sabrina E, Sanchez
AU - Ayoung-Chee, Patricia
AU - Victory, Jesse
AU - Guiden, Mary
AU - Bizzell, Bonnie
AU - Glaser, Jacob
AU - Hults, Christopher
AU - Thea P, Price
AU - Siparsky, Nicole
AU - Ohe, Kristin
AU - Katherine A, Mandell
AU - Daniel A, DeUgarte
AU - Amy H, Kaji
AU - Uribe, Lisandra
AU - Lillian S, Kao
AU - Krislynn M, Mueck
AU - Farjah, Farhood
AU - Wesley H, Self
AU - Clark, Sunday
AU - F Thurston, Drake
AU - Fischkoff, Katherine
AU - Minko, Elizaveta
AU - Cuschieri, Joseph
AU - Faine, Brett
AU - Dionne A, Skeete
AU - Dhanani, Naila
AU - Mike K, Liang
AU - Krishnadasan, Anusha
AU - David A, Talan
AU - Fannon, Erin
AU - Larry G, Kessler
AU - Bryan A, Comstock
AU - Patrick J, Heagerty
AU - Sarah E, Monsell
AU - Sarah O, Lawrence
AU - David R, Flum
AU - Danielle C, Lavallee
PY - 2022/7/11
Y1 - 2022/7/11
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare secondary patient reported outcomes of perceptions of treatment success and function for patients treated for appendicitis with appendectomy vs. antibiotics at 30 days.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The Comparison of Outcomes of antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy trial found antibiotics noninferior to appendectomy based on 30-day health status. To address questions about outcomes among participants with lower socioeconomic status, we explored the relationship of sociodemographic and clinical factors and outcomes.
METHODS: We focused on 4 patient reported outcomes at 30 days: high decisional regret, dissatisfaction with treatment, problems performing usual activities, and missing >10 days of work. The randomized (RCT) and observational cohorts were pooled for exploration of baseline factors. The RCT cohort alone was used for comparison of treatments. Logistic regression was used to assess associations.
RESULTS: The pooled cohort contained 2062 participants; 1552 from the RCT. Overall, regret and dissatisfaction were low whereas problems with usual activities and prolonged missed work occurred more frequently. In the RCT, those assigned to antibiotics had more regret (Odd ratios (OR) 2.97, 95% Confidence intervals (CI) 2.05-4.31) and dissatisfaction (OR 1.98, 95%CI 1.25-3.12), and reported less missed work (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.27-0.56). Factors associated with function outcomes included sociodemographic and clinical variables for both treatment arms. Fewer factors were associated with dissatisfaction and regret.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, participants reported high satisfaction, low regret, and were frequently able to resume usual activities and return to work. When comparing treatments for appendicitis, no single measure defines success or failure for all people. The reported data may inform discussions regarding the most appropriate treatment for individuals.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02800785.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare secondary patient reported outcomes of perceptions of treatment success and function for patients treated for appendicitis with appendectomy vs. antibiotics at 30 days.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The Comparison of Outcomes of antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy trial found antibiotics noninferior to appendectomy based on 30-day health status. To address questions about outcomes among participants with lower socioeconomic status, we explored the relationship of sociodemographic and clinical factors and outcomes.
METHODS: We focused on 4 patient reported outcomes at 30 days: high decisional regret, dissatisfaction with treatment, problems performing usual activities, and missing >10 days of work. The randomized (RCT) and observational cohorts were pooled for exploration of baseline factors. The RCT cohort alone was used for comparison of treatments. Logistic regression was used to assess associations.
RESULTS: The pooled cohort contained 2062 participants; 1552 from the RCT. Overall, regret and dissatisfaction were low whereas problems with usual activities and prolonged missed work occurred more frequently. In the RCT, those assigned to antibiotics had more regret (Odd ratios (OR) 2.97, 95% Confidence intervals (CI) 2.05-4.31) and dissatisfaction (OR 1.98, 95%CI 1.25-3.12), and reported less missed work (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.27-0.56). Factors associated with function outcomes included sociodemographic and clinical variables for both treatment arms. Fewer factors were associated with dissatisfaction and regret.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, participants reported high satisfaction, low regret, and were frequently able to resume usual activities and return to work. When comparing treatments for appendicitis, no single measure defines success or failure for all people. The reported data may inform discussions regarding the most appropriate treatment for individuals.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02800785.
M3 - Article
JO - Articles, Abstracts, and Reports
JF - Articles, Abstracts, and Reports
ER -