Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Physician-assisted suicide: Why both sides are wrong

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

For the past three decades, the debate over whether physicians should be legally able to write lethal prescriptions has been the dominant medium through which American society has wrestled with what to do when someone who is seriously ill is suffering. In state after state, lawyers and legislative champions act as warriors for right-to-die and right-to-life organizations. In each camp, meetings are held, bills and citizen initiatives drafted, lawsuits developed, rallies organized and, of course, checks written. The arguments are all too familiar and, by now, feel stale. Although little has changed since Oregon became the first state to sanction the practice, year after year legislative time and attention are conscripted to participate in the fight.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationFinal Acts
Subtitle of host publicationDeath, Dying, and the Choices We Make
PublisherRutgers University Press
Pages301-311
Number of pages11
Volume9780813549088
ISBN (Electronic)9780813549088
ISBN (Print)9780813546278
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Physician-assisted suicide: Why both sides are wrong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this