Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pixantrone-rituximab versus gemcitabine-rituximab in relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma

  • David Belada
  • , Pencho Georgiev
  • , Shaker Dakhil
  • , Lowell F. Inhorn
  • , David Andorsky
  • , J. Thaddeus Beck
  • , Donald Quick
  • , Ruth Pettengell
  • , Robert Daly
  • , James P. Dean
  • , Mariya Pavlyuk
  • , Nelly Failloux
  • , Kai Hübel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

We describe the rationale and design of the ongoing randomized, active-controlled, multicenter, Phase III study evaluating the efficacy of pixantrone and rituximab versus gemcitabine and rituximab in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or follicular grade 3 lymphoma, who are ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation, and who failed front-line regimens containing rituximab. The administration schedule is pixantrone 50 mg/m2 intravenously (iv.) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 iv. on days 1, 8 and 15, combined with rituximab 375 mg/m2 iv. on day 1, up to six cycles. Pixantrone has a conditional European marketing approval for monotherapy in adults with multiple relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Our trial explores the efficacy of combining pixantrone with rituximab and completes postauthorization measures. Trial registration number: NCT01321541.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1759-1768
Number of pages10
JournalFuture Oncology
Volume12
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • DLBCL
  • aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  • gemcitabine
  • pixantrone
  • relapse
  • rituximab

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pixantrone-rituximab versus gemcitabine-rituximab in relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this