Abstract
Parsimony and protein grouping are widely employed to enforce economy in the number of identified proteins, with the goal of increasing the quality and reliability of protein identifications; however, in a counterintuitive manner, parsimony and protein grouping may actually decrease the reproducibility and interpretability of protein identifications. We present a simple illustration demonstrating ways in which parsimony and protein grouping may lower the reproducibility or interpretability of results. We then provide an example of a data set where a probabilistic method increases the reproducibility and interpretability of identifications made on replicate analyses of Human Du145 prostate cancer cell lines.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5586-5591 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Proteome Research |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 7 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Human Du145 prostate cancer cell lines
- parsimony
- probabilistic protein inference
- protein grouping
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Recognizing uncertainty increases robustness and reproducibility of mass spectrometry-based protein inferences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver