Abstract
The study examined the relationship between implicit theories, goal orientations, subjective and test estimates of intelligence, academic self-concept, and achievement in a selective student population (N = 300). There was no direct impact of implicit theories of intelligence and goal orientations on achievement. However, subjective evaluations of intelligence and academic self-concept had incremental predictive value over conventional intelligence when predicting achievement accounting for more than 50% of its variance. The obtained pattern of results is presented via structural equation models and interpreted within a dynamic regulative systems framework suggesting the importance of further studying complex sets of achievement predictors that include ability, personality and mediating constructs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 596-608 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Learning and Individual Differences |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2009 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Academic self-concept
- Achievement
- Implicit theories
- Intelligence
- Subjective evaluations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Subjective evaluations of intelligence and academic self-concept predict academic achievement: Evidence from a selective student population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver