TY - JOUR
T1 - Survival with cemiplimab in recurrent cervical cancer
AU - Investigators for GOG Protocol 3016 and ENGOT Protocol En-Cx9
AU - Tewari, Krishnansu S.
AU - Monk, Bradley J.
AU - Vergote, Ignace
AU - Miller, Austin
AU - de Melo, Andreia C.
AU - Kim, Hee Seung
AU - Kim, Yong Man
AU - Lisyanskaya, Alla
AU - Samouëlian, Vanessa
AU - Lorusso, Domenica
AU - Damian, Fernanda
AU - Chang, Chih Long
AU - Gotovkin, Evgeniy A.
AU - Takahashi, Shunji
AU - Ramone, Daniella
AU - Pikiel, Joanna
AU - Maćkowiak-Matejczyk, Beata
AU - Guerra Alía, Eva M.
AU - Colombo, Nicoletta
AU - Makarova, Yulia
AU - Rischin, Danny
AU - Lheureux, Stephanie
AU - Hasegawa, Kosei
AU - Fujiwara, Keiichi
AU - Li, Jingjin
AU - Jamil, Shaheda
AU - Jankovic, Vladimir
AU - Chen, Chieh I.
AU - Seebach, Frank
AU - Weinreich, David M.
AU - Yancopoulos, George D.
AU - Lowy, Israel
AU - Mathias, Melissa
AU - Fury, Matthew G.
AU - Oaknin, Ana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society
PY - 2022/2/10
Y1 - 2022/2/10
N2 - BACKGROUND Patients with recurrent cervical cancer have a poor prognosis. Cemiplimab, the fully human programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)-blocking antibody approved to treat lung and skin cancers, has been shown to have preliminary clinical activity in this population. METHODS In this phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients who had disease progression after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy, regardless of their programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive cemiplimab (350 mg every 3 weeks) or the investigator's choice of single-agent chemotherapy. The primary end point was overall survival. Progression-free survival and safety were also assessed. RESULTS A total of 608 women were enrolled (304 in each group). In the overall trial population, median overall survival was longer in the cemiplimab group than in the chemotherapy group (12.0 months vs. 8.5 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 0.84; two-sided P<0.001). The overall survival benefit was consistent in both histologic subgroups (squamous-cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma [including adenosquamous carcinoma]). Progression-free survival was also longer in the cemiplimab group than in the chemotherapy group in the overall population (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89; two-sided P<0.001). In the overall population, an objective response occurred in 16.4% (95% CI, 12.5 to 21.1) of the patients in the cemiplimab group, as compared with 6.3% (95% CI, 3.8 to 9.6) in the chemotherapy group. An objective response occurred in 18% (95% CI, 11 to 28) of the cemiplimab-treated patients with PD-L1 expression greater than or equal to 1% and in 11% (95% CI, 4 to 25) of those with PD-L1 expression of less than 1%. Overall, grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 45.0% of the patients who received cemiplimab and in 53.4% of those who received chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Survival was significantly longer with cemiplimab than with single-agent chemotherapy among patients with recurrent cervical cancer after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy.
AB - BACKGROUND Patients with recurrent cervical cancer have a poor prognosis. Cemiplimab, the fully human programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)-blocking antibody approved to treat lung and skin cancers, has been shown to have preliminary clinical activity in this population. METHODS In this phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients who had disease progression after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy, regardless of their programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive cemiplimab (350 mg every 3 weeks) or the investigator's choice of single-agent chemotherapy. The primary end point was overall survival. Progression-free survival and safety were also assessed. RESULTS A total of 608 women were enrolled (304 in each group). In the overall trial population, median overall survival was longer in the cemiplimab group than in the chemotherapy group (12.0 months vs. 8.5 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 0.84; two-sided P<0.001). The overall survival benefit was consistent in both histologic subgroups (squamous-cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma [including adenosquamous carcinoma]). Progression-free survival was also longer in the cemiplimab group than in the chemotherapy group in the overall population (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89; two-sided P<0.001). In the overall population, an objective response occurred in 16.4% (95% CI, 12.5 to 21.1) of the patients in the cemiplimab group, as compared with 6.3% (95% CI, 3.8 to 9.6) in the chemotherapy group. An objective response occurred in 18% (95% CI, 11 to 28) of the cemiplimab-treated patients with PD-L1 expression greater than or equal to 1% and in 11% (95% CI, 4 to 25) of those with PD-L1 expression of less than 1%. Overall, grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 45.0% of the patients who received cemiplimab and in 53.4% of those who received chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Survival was significantly longer with cemiplimab than with single-agent chemotherapy among patients with recurrent cervical cancer after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124777796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa2112187
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa2112187
M3 - Article
C2 - 35139273
AN - SCOPUS:85124777796
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 386
SP - 544
EP - 555
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 6
ER -